FANDOM


  • Accusations of someone being a pedophile are pretty serious, I've looked through your ban appeal on SML Testing and, although I'm unaware of what specific "illustrations of fictional characters" wrongful or not you have shared, I can conclude through your contributions to UnAnything that you were not using the UnAnything Wiki platform to facilitate any wrongful activity whatsoever, and as such I have lifted your block.

    As long as you don't break this wiki's rules, you're free to contribute. If you shared provocative content on Fandom than I don't know why KATMAKROFAN didn't report you to the authorities of Fandom instead of just blocking you. (Or at least say you've been reported, and then proceed to block you)

      Loading editor
    • He was posting Rule 34 of lolis on the Random-Ness Wiki's Discord server.

        Loading editor
    • That's not on UnAnything or the Fandom platform.

        Loading editor
    • It still got him banned from RNW. A user on RNW told everyone reading their warning blog post to block him from their wikis.

        Loading editor
    • Random-Ness's Discord has nothing to do with UnAnything, that's a Random-Ness issue and Random-Ness has sorted it out. Konanoki on the UnAnythign wiki hasn't been vandalising pages, sockpuppeting or any of that. I see no reason why they should be blocked if they haven't done anything wrong on the Wikia platform.

        Loading editor
    • Pedophilia on any platform is wrong.

        Loading editor
    • KATMAKROFAN
      KATMAKROFAN removed this reply because:
      Unfunny
      23:56, May 7, 2020
      This reply has been removed
    • I agree, but you have to realise that Kananoki hasn't been using Wikia for that type of stuff. The moment they do so they can be reported to fandom and then blocked, but the thing is they haven't been using Fandom or UnAnything for pedophilia, there is no need for this person to be blocked if they haven't done anything wrong here.

        Loading editor
    • But they have done something wrong on Discord, which shares much of its users with Fandom. Ask User:ITVdude2000 about it.

        Loading editor
    • I've already stated that the random-ness discord is irrelevant to UnAnything and that this is a random-ness issue. The amount of evidence there might potentially be is irrelevant to UnAnything and the rest of Fandom as a whole. Stop trying to bring another wiki's issues here. 

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.